Surveillance
Working in BSE Detection
“Our surveillance system is working,” says Nancy Montross, a DeSmet, S.D.
beef producer and president of the state organization that collects the
$1-per-head checkoff on all beef animals in
“Since
June 2004 we’ve tested more than 388,000 samples of high-risk animals and
we’ve had confirmation of just this one case—and this animal never entered
the human or animal feed supply,” explains Montross. “Consumers can be
assured that their beef supply is safe.”
USDA
recently announced the test results on an older animal born before a specific
feed ban was put in place back in 1997 to protect against the transmission of
BSE in cattle. The highly sensitive rapid screening test used for BSE
surveillance first identified this sample as a potential case in November 2004.
However,
another confirmatory test—immunohistochemistry (IHC)—determined the sample
was negative. The USDA’s Office of Inspector General, as part of its review of
USDA’s enhanced BSE surveillance system, decided in June that USDA should
retest the sample. The Western Blot test was used for the retest and detected
indications of BSE. Confirmation was provided by a laboratory in
“The USDA and the beef industry understand how extremely important it is to
ensure that the beef we eat is safe,” says Montross. “It continues to be our
top priority. This system of testing and keeping high risk animals from the food
supply is working.”
Both
the IHC and Western blot are recognized by the World Animal Health Organization
as BSE confirmatory tests. Effective immediately, USDA will run both the IHC and
Western Blot as confirmatory tests.
Montross
says it’s critical that consumers understand the following:
Montross
adds that the aggressive steps by the